Breaking
World leaders gather for emergency summit on climate crisis • Tech giants announce major breakthrough in fusion energy • Stocks reach all-time high as global trade recovers • Global News 24 launches premium news experience • Stay updated with real-time headlines •
BACK TO NEWS
Sportsabout 12 hours ago

Alex Murdaugh’s murder convictions overturned by South Carolina supreme court

The Guardian
The Guardian

Verified Publisher

Alex Murdaugh’s murder convictions overturned by South Carolina supreme court

Justices said decision was due to ‘improper external influences on the jury’ by a court clerk during the trialSign up for the Breaking News US newsletter emailThe South Carolina supreme

Alex Murdaugh at the Richland county judicial center in Columbia, South Carolina, on 29 January 2024.

Photograph: The State/TNS View image in fullscreen Alex Murdaugh at the Richland county judicial center in Columbia, South Carolina, on 29 January 2024.

Photograph: The State/TNS Alex Murdaugh’s murder convictions overturned by South Carolina supreme court Justices said decision was due to ‘improper external influences on the jury’ by a court clerk during the trial Sign up for the Breaking News US newsletter email The South Carolina supreme court on Wednesday overturned the murder convictions of Alex Murdaugh , the disgraced South Carolina attorney, due to “shocking jury interference” and ordered a new trial in the 2021 killing of his wife and son.

“Our justice system provides – indeed demands – that every person is entitled to a fair trial, which includes an impartial jury untainted by external forces bent on influencing the jury toward a biased verdict,” the justices wrote in a unanimous opinion .

“Although we are aware of the time, money, and effort expended for this lengthy trial, we have no choice but to reverse the denial of Murdaugh’s motion for a new trial,” they said, because of what they described as “improper external influences on the jury” by a court clerk during the trial.

The justices wrote that the Colleton county clerk of court, who was assigned to oversee the evidence and the jury during the trial, “egregiously attacked Murdaugh’s credibility and his defense, thus triggering the presumption of prejudice, which the State was unable to rebut”.

And because of what they described as “shocking jury interference” by the court clerk during the trial, the court’s justices wrote that “we are accordingly constrained to reverse the post-trial court’s denial of Murdaugh’s motion and remand for a new trial consistent with this opinion.” Murdaugh, 57, was convicted by a jury in 2023 for the murders of his wife, Maggie, and his 22-year-old son, Paul in 2021, in a trial that drew national attention. Murdaugh, who has denied killing his wife and son, received two life sentences for the murder charges.

The decision on Wednesday does not mean that Murdaugh will be getting out of prison. He previously pleaded guilty to financial crimes, including stealing millions from clients and his law firm, and is serving a 40-year federal sentence. Murdaugh also pleaded guilty in South Carolina state court to financial crimes and was ordered to spend 27 years in prison.

Wednesday’s decision comes after Murdaugh’s lawyers filed an appeal post-conviction, arguing that the court clerk, Becky Hill, improperly influenced jurors during the trial and that the judge had allowed improper evidence. But prosecutors argued the convictions should stand.

Hill later resigned from the Colleton county court , and in December, she pleaded guilty to criminal charges for showing sealed court exhibits to a photographer and lying about it in court. She also pleaded guilty to two counts of misconduct in office for taking bonuses and promoting through her public office a book she wrote on the trial. She was sentenced to three years of probation.

In Wednesday’s decision, the South Carolina supreme court justices said: “Both the State and Murdaugh’s defense skillfully presented their cases to the jury as the trial court deftly presided over this complicated and high-profile matter. However, their efforts were in vain because Colleton county clerk of court Rebecca Hill placed her fingers on the scales of justice, thereby denying Murdaugh his right to a fair trial by an impartial jury.” Explore more on these topics South Carolina US crime news Share Reuse this content

Read original story at The Guardian

Continue reading this article on the publisher's website.

Visit Website

More from The Guardian

Rand Paul’s son apologizes for antisemitic and anti-gay rant after accosting lawmaker
Technology
The Guardian
The Guardianabout 1 hour ago1 min read

Rand Paul’s son apologizes for antisemitic and anti-gay rant after accosting lawmaker

In apology, William Paul said he had had ‘too much to drink’ and the things he said ‘don’t represent who I really am’Republican senator Rand Paul’s son William apologized on Wednesday for a drunken tirade at a bar in Washington DC, in which he reportedly told a Republican congressman he “hates Jews and hates gays”.“Last night, I had too much to drink and said some things that don’t represent who I really am. I’m sorry and today I am seeking help for my drinking problem,” William

‘Stunned and shocked’: Ingrid Horrocks wins top prize at New Zealand’s Ockham awards for her fiction debut
Politics
The Guardian
The Guardianabout 1 hour ago1 min read

‘Stunned and shocked’: Ingrid Horrocks wins top prize at New Zealand’s Ockham awards for her fiction debut

All Her Lives is only the fifth short story collection to win the prestigious NZ$65,000 prize in 58 yearsFirst-time fiction writer Ingrid Horrocks has won New Zealand’s richest literary prize for her debut short story collection, All Her Lives.The Wellington-based poet, essayist and memoirist won the prestigious NZ$65,000 (A$53,000, £28,500) Jann

Labor accused of ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’ for axing $760m research program to fund other science measures
Sports
The Guardian
The Guardianabout 2 hours ago1 min read

Labor accused of ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’ for axing $760m research program to fund other science measures

Researchers say budget decision to cut commercialisation program to fund the CSIRO and other science initiatives undermines the government’s own prioritiesExplore all of our 2026 Australia federal budget coverageGet our breaking news email, free app or