Supreme court rejects Virginia Democrats’ bid to restore congressional map

Northern Virginia's congressional map at a voting precinct at Centreville high school in Clifton, Virginia, on 17 June 2025.

Photograph: The Washington Post/Getty Images View image in fullscreen Northern Virginia's congressional map at a voting precinct at Centreville high school in Clifton, Virginia, on 17 June 2025.

Photograph: The Washington Post/Getty Images Supreme court rejects Virginia Democrats’ bid to restore congressional map Order, issued without any noted dissent, is the latest twist in the nation’s mid-decade redistricting competition The supreme court on Friday rejected Virginia’s bid to restore a congressional map that would have given Democrats a chance to pick up four seats in the closely divided House of Representatives.

The court’s order, issued without any noted dissent, is the latest twist in the nation’s mid-decade redistricting competition . It was kicked off last year by Donald Trump urging Republican-controlled states to redraw their lines and was supercharged by a recent supreme court ruling severely weakening the Voting Rights Act that opened up even more winnable seats for the Republican party.

In recent days, the justices have sided with Republicans in Alabama and Louisiana who hope to redo their congressional maps to produce more Republican-leaning seats following the court’s voting rights decision.

But the Virginia situation was different, stemming from a 4-3 ruling by the Virginia supreme court that struck down a constitutional amendment that voters narrowly passed just last month.

The state court found that the Democratic-controlled legislature improperly began the process of placing the amendment on the ballot after early voting had begun in Virginia’s general election last fall.

The supreme court typically doesn’t intervene in state court proceedings unless they present an issue of federal law. Virginia Democrats had hoped to persuade the justices that the Virginia court misread federal law and supreme court precedent that hold that, even if early voting is under way, an election does not happen until election day itself.

Virginia’s amendment had been intended as a response to Republican gains in Texas, Missouri, North Carolina and Ohio, and to blunt a new map in Florida that just became law. Once the Virginia amendment passed, it briefly turned the nationwide redistricting scramble into a draw between the two parties.

That was unraveled by the Virginia supreme court’s decision.

It’s possible Democrats could use the high court’s rejection of their bid, while also blessing Republican efforts in Alabama and Louisiana, in election-year messaging about a partisan supreme court.

The state’s top Democrats disagreed about whether it was even too late for help from the supreme court. “Time grows short, but it is not yet too late,” lawyers for the Democratic leaders of the legislature as well as the state told the justices in a brief filed Friday.

A day earlier, the office of the Democratic governor, Abigail Spanberger, already had confirmed that the state will hold this year’s elections under the current districts established in 2021. Last month, the Virginia commissioner of elections, Steve Koski, said a court order was needed by this past Tuesday to set the district lines for primary elections on 4 August.

The leader of the state’s Republican party said the justices made the right call. “Wisely, the Supreme Court of the United States has confirmed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Virginia,” state party chair Jeff Ryer said. “This should once and for all put to rest the Democrats’ effort to disenfranchise half of Virginia.” Explore more on these topics Virginia US voting rights House of Representatives US supreme court US Congress US politics news Share Reuse this content