Breaking
World leaders gather for emergency summit on climate crisis • Tech giants announce major breakthrough in fusion energy • Stocks reach all-time high as global trade recovers • Global News 24 launches premium news experience • Stay updated with real-time headlines •
BACK TO NEWS
Worldabout 4 hours ago

What to expect from the 48-team format at the World Cup 2026

Al Jazeera
Al Jazeera

Verified Publisher

What to expect from the 48-team format at the World Cup 2026

Al Jazeera examines key talking points related to the introduction of an expanded 48-nation tournament.

Save Click here to share on social media share-nodes Share facebook x whatsapp-stroke copylink google Add Al Jazeera on Google info FIFA World Cup 2026, hosted by the USA, Canada, and Mexico, will feature a record 48 teams divided into 12 groups of four [Patrick T Fallon/AFP] Published On 14 May 2026 14 May 2026 The FIFA World Cup 2026 will be one like never before.

Featuring 48 teams from across six confederations, the tournament will be the biggest in the competition’s 96-year history.

Recommended Stories list of 4 items list 1 of 4 All you need to know as Ronda Rousey and Gina Carano finally face-off list 2 of 4 Why are World Cup tickets so expensive?

list 3 of 4 Can you identify all 48 teams in World Cup 2026?

External Link This article will be opened in a new browser window list 4 of 4 ‘Never give up’: Meet Curacao, the smallest country at a FIFA World Cup end of list What once started as a mere 13-team World Cup has now expanded by nearly four times.

From minnows to giants, there is a place for one and all in the new expanded format, but how does it benefit the global game, and what are the potential drawbacks of opening the door to more teams?

All to know about the new format before the tournament start on June 11: How the 48-team format works The participating nations are divided into 12 groups of four teams each, replacing the previous 32-team, eight-group format.

The top two teams in each of the 12 groups, plus the eight best third-placed teams, will advance to the round of 32.

From there on, it’s a straightforward knockout format, followed by the last-16, quarterfinals, semifinals and the final.

World Cup expansion is “a natural evolution” for football Former Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger, now FIFA’s chief of global football development, thinks expanding the tournament is a step towards making football “truly global” and raising the standards.

Nearly a quarter of the 211 FIFA national member associations worldwide will be represented at the 2026 World Cup.

[Al Jazeera] “It’s a natural evolution. I think we want to make football global all over the world. And if you look at the evolution (from) 1930, in 2030, the next World Cup will be 100 years since the World Cup [existed],” Wenger told a media conference in December.

Advertisement “We started with 13 teams, after [that], 16… 1982 was the first time with 24 teams. 1998 was the first time with 32 teams. So, the evolution is (that) always more teams want to participate. And now I believe that 48 teams is the right number,” added the Frenchman.

More revenue for FIFA, more money for football According to a FIFA release in mid-April, the World Trade Organization (WTO) estimated that the expanded tournament will produce $80.1bn in gross output, including $30.5bn to the cohost, the United States.

While that impact is spread across the US economy, the $11bn in FIFA World Cup revenue that the international football body expects to generate this year will be ploughed back into the game, FIFA President Gianni Infantino said.

FIFA President Gianni Infantino holds the FIFA World Cup trophy as he attends the 56th annual World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 22, 2026 [Denis Balibouse/Reuters] “That goes in 211 countries all over the world, to allow football projects, academies, stadiums, pitches, competitions for girls, for boys, in 211 countries – more than the UN – to be played and organised,” he said at the CNBC Invest in America Forum in Washington, DC, on April 15.

“Three quarters of them would probably not be able to have organised sport without the advance that they receive from a competition like the World Cup,” Infantino added.

Expansion offers more opportunities for smaller nations The expanded format has opened new doors for nations that had little to no chance of qualification under the old 32-team format.

Among those are four nations that will be making their debut in North America: Curacao, the smallest nation ever to qualify for a World Cup, fellow minnows Cape Verde, and Asian newcomers Jordan and Uzbekistan.

The four debutants’ entry falls just short of the record of six set at the inaugural edition in 1930 and in 2006 – but as many as nine potential newcomers were in contention for World Cup qualification heading into the March playoffs.

After near-misses, Uzbekistan will finally make their World Cup debut in North America [File: Rula Rouhana/Reuters] While the men’s World Cup underwent expansion this year, the women’s equivalent was also stretched from 24 to 32 nations three years ago. The idea to expand the Women’s World Cup was initially met with scepticism, but as eight newcomers took part in the 2023 World Cup in Australia, many of the minnows pulled off upsets .

Tokyo 2020 Olympic champions Canada, former world champions Germany and heavyweights Brazil all crashed out in the group stage while Jamaica, South Africa and Morocco made history by advancing to the knockout stage for the first time.

Advertisement That tournament also reminded fans how the accuracy of the FIFA rankings could be skewed because some of the low-ranked teams do not play as many international matches as their more illustrious opponents.

Risk of low-stakes, one-sided fixtures While the expanded 2026 tournament has gifted opportunities to more teams, many of whom would not have qualified under the previous format, it could also lead to a new problem: A rise in low-stakes, potentially one-sided match-ups.

It doesn’t take long to glance at the group stage fixtures to identify some potentially lopsided matches. Iran, one of Asia’s strongest sides, will face New Zealand, the lowest-ranked team in the tournament, raising the likelihood of a mismatch that offers little competitive intrigue for the average football fan.

Elsewhere, group-stage meetings between micro nation Curacao and tournament heavyweights Germany as well as Cape Verde taking on the might of UEFA Euro 2024 champions Spain risks turning those fixtures into a route for the European nations.

Curacao are one of the four teams making their World Cup debut this year [AFP File] In the big picture, these potentially uneven contests could dilute the intensity and quality of group stage fixtures that have traditionally defined the World Cup, and risk turning them into predictable, low-engagement affairs for the opening half of the 39-day tournament.

Additionally, expanding the format could lead to easier, boring routes to the knockouts.

For example, a team could draw all three of its group games and still make the cut to the next round. At the very least, expansion from 32 to 48 teams risks altering the competitive dynamics of the group stage.

Short post-World Cup recovery window for players With 56 days, FIFA has said the total combined number of rest, release and tournament days remains identical to the 2010, 2014 and 2018 FIFA World Cup editions. But what about the post-tournament recovery period?

Most of the top European leagues will begin their 2026-27 season just a month after the World Cup final, leaving players with a short offseason to relax and recover from injuries.

A report by the Football Benchmark group, which used data from the FIFPRO Men’s Player Workload Monitoring (PWM) platform, further highlighted this issue.

Morocco’s Achraf Hakimi reacts after sustaining an injury while playing for his club PSG [Sarah Meyssonnier/Reuters] “The move from 32 to 48 teams increases the total number of matches from 64 to 104, with the finalists required to play up to eight matches across a 38-day period. Positioned shortly after the European club season and following consecutive summers of major international and club competitions, it also brings additional logistical demands, including long-distance travel, multiple time zones, and varied climatic conditions across host cities,” the analysis read.

“In addition, the window between the World Cup final and the start of the following domestic season is limited, with 34 days separating the final and the start of the Premier League season, leaving reduced time for rest and preseason preparation.” Advertisement

Read original story at Al Jazeera

Continue reading this article on the publisher's website.

Visit Website

More from Al Jazeera